PROOF OF NECESSITY
Your defence to procurement: why standard training contracts structurally cannot deliver competence transfer in regulated UK sectors
The System Works. Staff Don't Use It.
Post-implementation adoption failure is the single largest category of IT project waste. The technology went live. The budget burned. Three months later, nobody's using it.
Five Consecutive Days Violates Neuroscience
The 5-day classroom model violates three foundational principles of cognitive science—each established through decades of experimental research, none seriously disputed.
Your Training is Stuck in Three People's Heads
Theory of Constraints (Goldratt, 1984): every system's throughput is limited by its tightest bottleneck. In training content development, that bottleneck is the Subject Matter Expert.
Good Trainers, Wrong Contract
Steven Kerr (1975): "On the Folly of Rewarding A, While Hoping for B"—organisations systematically reward behaviours they claim to discourage.
"Make Them Confident" Isn't an Outcome
Kirkpatrick Model (1959): training has four evaluation levels. The data on how organisations actually evaluate is damning.
Tick-Box Theatre vs Actual Competence
In UK regulated sectors, the gap between training completion and behaviour change is material regulatory risk.
Stop the Bleed
The evidence is overwhelming. The standard model doesn't work. Your procurement decision needs defending.
Surgical intervention stops the burn before it compounds.